备选平台

Coinbase identification mark

Coinbase 备选平台 — 证据比较

备选平台用于证据比较,不是推荐。纳入是因为公开证据属性与 Coinbase 不同 — 不是因为 Coinbase “不好”,也不是因为商业关系。

为何纳入这些平台

每个候选至少在一项已发布证据属性上与 Coinbase 不同(监管、法律实体映射、储备证明、托管、地域记录、产品或完整度)。选择由公开快照决定。

证据属性

平台监管法律实体储备证明托管地域范围产品覆盖度
2101526 / 7i
26221677 / 7i
4413347 / 7i
11111657 / 7i
11112847 / 7i
11111567 / 7i
OKX identification mark

OKX

监管证据托管模式储备证明可得性费用透明度地域记录产品收录公开记录完整度法域
  • — Regulatory records on file: Coinbase 2 (exact IDs 2) vs OKX 2 (exact IDs 1).
  • — Custody claim records: Coinbase 1 vs OKX 2.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Coinbase 0 vs OKX 2 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Coinbase 1 vs OKX 2.
Binance identification mark

Binance

监管证据托管模式储备证明可得性费用透明度地域记录产品收录公开记录完整度法域
  • — Regulatory records on file: Coinbase 2 (exact IDs 2) vs Binance 4 (exact IDs 4).
  • — Custody claim records: Coinbase 1 vs Binance 3.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Coinbase 0 vs Binance 1 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Coinbase 1 vs Binance 2.
Kraken identification mark (not an official logo)

Kraken

监管证据储备证明可得性费用透明度地域记录产品收录公开记录完整度法域
  • — Regulatory records on file: Coinbase 2 (exact IDs 2) vs Kraken 1 (exact IDs 1).
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Coinbase 0 vs Kraken 1 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Coinbase 1 vs Kraken 2.
  • — Geographic restriction records: Coinbase 5 vs Kraken 16.
Bitget identification mark (not an official logo)

Bitget

监管证据储备证明可得性费用透明度地域记录产品收录法域
  • — Regulatory records on file: Coinbase 2 (exact IDs 2) vs Bitget 1 (exact IDs 0).
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Coinbase 0 vs Bitget 1 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Coinbase 1 vs Bitget 2.
  • — Geographic restriction records: Coinbase 5 vs Bitget 28.
Bybit identification mark (not an official logo)

Bybit

监管证据储备证明可得性费用透明度地域记录产品收录法域
  • — Regulatory records on file: Coinbase 2 (exact IDs 2) vs Bybit 1 (exact IDs 0).
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Coinbase 0 vs Bybit 1 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Coinbase 1 vs Bybit 2.
  • — Geographic restriction records: Coinbase 5 vs Bybit 15.

仍未解决的问题

未决问题与缺失领域保持未知。空单元格不是安全结论。

  • Coinbase: No crypto-native PoR snapshot row. SEC/audited financials and customer-asset safeguarding disclosures remain separate transparency (see attributedStatements) — not mapped into por[].
  • Coinbase: 2026-09-13 re-check: Coinbase Advanced Trade full maker/taker VIP schedule still behind Help/Cloudflare or signed-in Advanced fees / authenticated brokerage APIs. Recorded only official simple limit-order execution fee (1%). Do not treat 1% as Advanced Trade. Coinbase Exchange fee tables are a different product surface.
  • OKX: 已确认状态页。本阶段未结构化带日期的重大事件。
  • Binance: ADGM Nest trio roles mapped from official ADGM Terms; Binance FZE mapped from FZE Terms + VARA VL/24/04/001. Do not treat any single entity licence as brand-wide global authorisation. Nest Trading Limited role kept as unknown enum (broker-dealer/off-exchange per terms) pending richer role taxonomy.
  • Kraken: 已确认状态页。本阶段未结构化带日期的重大事件。
  • Bitget: FSA Seychelles lists BTG Technology Holdings Limited on the VASP Assessment list (2026-03-09). Not a granted licence. 运营主体 marketing licences (AUSTRAC etc.) were not confirmed on primary registers in this pass; VARA public register has no Bitget VASP licence row (2026-09-13).
  • Bitget: 未收录经确认的一次事件记录。
  • Bybit: SATOS partnership terms are regional/partner-scoped; not applied as global Bybit custody. Added PoR wallet-disclosure claim only.

局限

这不是“最佳备选”排名。档案再核验后差异可能变化。区域记录并不意味着全球获批。