备选平台

Upbit identification mark (not an official logo)

Upbit 备选平台 — 证据比较

备选平台用于证据比较,不是推荐。纳入是因为公开证据属性与 Upbit 不同 — 不是因为 Upbit “不好”,也不是因为商业关系。

为何纳入这些平台

每个候选至少在一项已发布证据属性上与 Upbit 不同(监管、法律实体映射、储备证明、托管、地域记录、产品或完整度)。选择由公开快照决定。

证据属性

平台监管法律实体储备证明托管地域范围产品覆盖度
1102025 / 7i
23133827 / 7i
00114345 / 7i
4413347 / 7i
11112847 / 7i
11111567 / 7i
Crypto.com identification mark (not an official logo)

Crypto.com

场所架构监管证据托管模式储备证明可得性费用透明度地域记录产品收录公开记录完整度法域
  • — Published venue boundary differs (national_venue vs exchange). Interface/protocol presentation is kept distinct from custodial exchange records.
  • — Regulatory records on file: Upbit 1 (exact IDs 1) vs Crypto.com 2 (exact IDs 2).
  • — Custody claim records: Upbit 2 vs Crypto.com 3.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Upbit 0 vs Crypto.com 1 (PoR ≠ audit).
HTX identification mark (not an official logo)

HTX

场所架构监管证据托管模式储备证明可得性费用透明度地域记录产品收录公开记录完整度法域
  • — Published venue boundary differs (national_venue vs platform). Interface/protocol presentation is kept distinct from custodial exchange records.
  • — Regulatory records on file: Upbit 1 (exact IDs 1) vs HTX 0 (exact IDs 0).
  • — Custody claim records: Upbit 2 vs HTX 1.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Upbit 0 vs HTX 1 (PoR ≠ audit).
Binance identification mark

Binance

监管证据托管模式储备证明可得性费用透明度地域记录产品收录公开记录完整度法域
  • — Regulatory records on file: Upbit 1 (exact IDs 1) vs Binance 4 (exact IDs 4).
  • — Custody claim records: Upbit 2 vs Binance 3.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Upbit 0 vs Binance 1 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Upbit 4 vs Binance 2.
Bitget identification mark (not an official logo)

Bitget

监管证据托管模式储备证明可得性费用透明度地域记录产品收录公开记录完整度法域
  • — Regulatory records on file: Upbit 1 (exact IDs 1) vs Bitget 1 (exact IDs 0).
  • — Custody claim records: Upbit 2 vs Bitget 1.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Upbit 0 vs Bitget 1 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Upbit 4 vs Bitget 2.
Bybit identification mark (not an official logo)

Bybit

监管证据托管模式储备证明可得性费用透明度地域记录产品收录公开记录完整度法域
  • — Regulatory records on file: Upbit 1 (exact IDs 1) vs Bybit 1 (exact IDs 0).
  • — Custody claim records: Upbit 2 vs Bybit 1.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Upbit 0 vs Bybit 1 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Upbit 4 vs Bybit 2.

仍未解决的问题

未决问题与缺失领域保持未知。空单元格不是安全结论。

  • Upbit: 未找到可用于 SAFE 插入的带日期官方 PoR/鉴证快照。
  • Upbit: 未收录经确认的一次事件记录。
  • Crypto.com: HISTORICAL only: Mazars AUP as of 2022-12-07 still hosted. Re-check 2026-09-13 found no newer dated official Exchange PoR / attestation / wallet disclosure snapshot. STALE as current reserve evidence — do not present as current.
  • Crypto.com: 已确认状态页。未结构化带日期的重大事件(状态≠事件)。
  • HTX: Current HTX Platform User Agreement defines contracting parties as collective 'HTX Operators' (legal persons/DAO/unincorporated organisations/teams) without naming a single global 运营主体 company. Do not inherit Huobi Global Limited / Huobi Global S.A. as current HTX 运营主体 without a current primary source tying that name to today's platform.
  • HTX: No regulator-register row attachable: named current global HTX 运营主体 entity still unresolved. Legacy Huobi licence claims from secondary news not applied.
  • Binance: ADGM Nest trio roles mapped from official ADGM Terms; Binance FZE mapped from FZE Terms + VARA VL/24/04/001. Do not treat any single entity licence as brand-wide global authorisation. Nest Trading Limited role kept as unknown enum (broker-dealer/off-exchange per terms) pending richer role taxonomy.
  • Bitget: FSA Seychelles lists BTG Technology Holdings Limited on the VASP Assessment list (2026-03-09). Not a granted licence. 运营主体 marketing licences (AUSTRAC etc.) were not confirmed on primary registers in this pass; VARA public register has no Bitget VASP licence row (2026-09-13).

局限

这不是“最佳备选”排名。档案再核验后差异可能变化。区域记录并不意味着全球获批。