VENUEVERITAS

備選平台

Gate identification mark (not an official logo)

Gate 備選平台 — 證據比較

備選平台用於證據比較，不是推薦。納入是因為公開證據屬性與 Gate 不同 — 不是因為 Gate「不好」，也不是因為商業關係。

Gate 檔案造訪 Gate

為何納入這些平台

每個候選至少在一項已發布證據屬性上與 Gate 不同（監管、法律實體對應、準備金證明、託管、地域紀錄、產品或完整度）。選擇由公開快照決定。

證據屬性

平台監管法律實體準備金證明託管地域範圍產品覆蓋度
Gate identification mark (not an official logo)Gate
11173537 / 7i
OKX identification markOKX
26221677 / 7i
Aster
00011123 / 7i
Bybit identification mark (not an official logo)Bybit
11111567 / 7i
dYdX identification mark (not an official logo)dYdX
0202914 / 7i
Hyperliquid identification mark (not an official logo)Hyperliquid
0101215 / 7i
OKX identification mark

OKX

監管證據託管模式準備金證明可得性地域紀錄產品收錄公開紀錄完整度法域
  • — Regulatory records on file: Gate 1 (exact IDs 1) vs OKX 2 (exact IDs 1).
  • — Custody claim records: Gate 7 vs OKX 2.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Gate 1 vs OKX 2 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Geographic restriction records: Gate 35 vs OKX 16.
開啟檔案與 Gate 比較造訪 OKX

Aster

監管證據託管模式準備金證明可得性費用透明度地域紀錄產品收錄公開紀錄完整度法域
  • — Regulatory records on file: Gate 1 (exact IDs 1) vs Aster 0 (exact IDs 0).
  • — Custody claim records: Gate 7 vs Aster 1.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Gate 1 vs Aster 0 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Gate 2 vs Aster 0.
開啟檔案造訪 Aster
Bybit identification mark (not an official logo)

Bybit

監管證據託管模式地域紀錄產品收錄法域
  • — Regulatory records on file: Gate 1 (exact IDs 1) vs Bybit 1 (exact IDs 0).
  • — Custody claim records: Gate 7 vs Bybit 1.
  • — Geographic restriction records: Gate 35 vs Bybit 15.
  • — Product records: Gate 3 vs Bybit 6 (overlap 3).
開啟檔案與 Gate 比較造訪 Bybit
dYdX identification mark (not an official logo)

dYdX

監管證據託管模式準備金證明可得性費用透明度地域紀錄產品收錄公開紀錄完整度法域
  • — Regulatory records on file: Gate 1 (exact IDs 1) vs dYdX 0 (exact IDs 0).
  • — Custody claim records: Gate 7 vs dYdX 2.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Gate 1 vs dYdX 0 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Gate 2 vs dYdX 0.
開啟檔案造訪 dYdX
Hyperliquid identification mark (not an official logo)

Hyperliquid

監管證據託管模式準備金證明可得性費用透明度地域紀錄產品收錄公開紀錄完整度法域
  • — Regulatory records on file: Gate 1 (exact IDs 1) vs Hyperliquid 0 (exact IDs 0).
  • — Custody claim records: Gate 7 vs Hyperliquid 1.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Gate 1 vs Hyperliquid 0 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Gate 2 vs Hyperliquid 8.
開啟檔案造訪 Hyperliquid

仍未解決的問題

未決問題與缺失領域保持未知。空儲存格不是安全結論。

  • Gate: 未收錄經確認的一次事件紀錄。
  • Gate: Current platform PoR snapshot recorded from gate.com/proof-of-reserves (audit time 2026-08-19, Merkle+zk-SNARK). HACKEN Jan 2024 entry on the same page documents PoR implementation methodology — not treated as the current reserve snapshot date. Independent attester PDF for the 2026-08-19 snapshot not separately packaged.
  • OKX: 已確認狀態頁。本階段未結構化附日期的重大事件。
  • Aster: Terms/Privacy remain brand-only 'Aster'; no discrete corporate legal name confirmed. Re-audited 2026-09-13: keep THIN; do not invent fills.
  • Aster: 未找到監管機構許可／註冊識別碼。條款禁止部分法域，但未建立授權紀錄。
  • Bybit: SATOS partnership terms are regional/partner-scoped; not applied as global Bybit custody. Added PoR wallet-disclosure claim only.
  • Bybit: 本階段未收錄經確認的一次事件紀錄。
  • dYdX: dYdX Operations Services Limited / dYdX Trading Inc. named; DTI states it does not operate public deployments — no licence record packaged. Re-audited 2026-09-13: keep THIN; do not invent fills.

相關比較

局限

這不是「最佳備選」排名。檔案再核驗後差異可能變化。區域紀錄並不意味著全球獲批。