Alternatives

Gate identification mark (not an official logo)

Gate Alternatives — Evidence Comparison

Alternative venues are shown for evidence comparison and are not recommendations. They are included because published evidence attributes differ from Gate — not because Gate is “bad”, and not because of commercial relationships.

Why these venues are included

Each candidate differs from Gate on at least one published evidence attribute (regulation, legal-entity mapping, PoR, custody, geographic records, products, or completeness). Inclusion is deterministic from the public snapshot.

Evidence attributes

VenueRegulationLegal entitiesPoRCustodyGeographic scopeProductsCoverage
11173537 / 7i
26221677 / 7i
00011123 / 7i
11111567 / 7i
0202914 / 7i
0101215 / 7i
OKX identification mark

OKX

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelPoR availabilityRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction
  • — Regulatory records on file: Gate 1 (exact IDs 1) vs OKX 2 (exact IDs 1).
  • — Custody claim records: Gate 7 vs OKX 2.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Gate 1 vs OKX 2 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Geographic restriction records: Gate 35 vs OKX 16.

Aster

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelPoR availabilityFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction
  • — Regulatory records on file: Gate 1 (exact IDs 1) vs Aster 0 (exact IDs 0).
  • — Custody claim records: Gate 7 vs Aster 1.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Gate 1 vs Aster 0 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Gate 2 vs Aster 0.
Bybit identification mark (not an official logo)

Bybit

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelRegional availabilityProduct availabilityJurisdiction
  • — Regulatory records on file: Gate 1 (exact IDs 1) vs Bybit 1 (exact IDs 0).
  • — Custody claim records: Gate 7 vs Bybit 1.
  • — Geographic restriction records: Gate 35 vs Bybit 15.
  • — Product records: Gate 3 vs Bybit 6 (overlap 3).
dYdX identification mark (not an official logo)

dYdX

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelPoR availabilityFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction
  • — Regulatory records on file: Gate 1 (exact IDs 1) vs dYdX 0 (exact IDs 0).
  • — Custody claim records: Gate 7 vs dYdX 2.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Gate 1 vs dYdX 0 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Gate 2 vs dYdX 0.
Hyperliquid identification mark (not an official logo)

Hyperliquid

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelPoR availabilityFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction
  • — Regulatory records on file: Gate 1 (exact IDs 1) vs Hyperliquid 0 (exact IDs 0).
  • — Custody claim records: Gate 7 vs Hyperliquid 1.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Gate 1 vs Hyperliquid 0 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Gate 2 vs Hyperliquid 8.

What remains unresolved

Open questions and missing domains stay unknown. An empty cell is not a safety finding.

  • Gate: No confirmed primary incident packaged
  • Gate: Current platform PoR snapshot recorded from gate.com/proof-of-reserves (audit time 2026-08-19, Merkle+zk-SNARK). HACKEN Jan 2024 entry on the same page documents PoR implementation methodology — not treated as the current reserve snapshot date. Independent attester PDF for the 2026-08-19 snapshot not separately packaged.
  • OKX: Status page located; no dated material incident structured this phase
  • Aster: Terms/Privacy remain brand-only 'Aster'; no discrete corporate legal name confirmed. Re-audited 2026-09-13: keep THIN; do not invent fills.
  • Aster: No regulator licence/registration identifier found; Terms prohibit jurisdictions but do not establish authorization record
  • Bybit: SATOS partnership terms are regional/partner-scoped; not applied as global Bybit custody. Added PoR wallet-disclosure claim only.
  • Bybit: No confirmed primary incident record packaged this phase
  • dYdX: dYdX Operations Services Limited / dYdX Trading Inc. named; DTI states it does not operate public deployments — no licence record packaged. Re-audited 2026-09-13: keep THIN; do not invent fills.

Related comparisons

Limitations

This is not a “best alternative” ranking. Evidence differences can change as records are re-verified. Regional records do not imply global approval.