Alternatives

Binance Alternatives — Evidence Comparison

Alternative venues are shown for evidence comparison and are not recommendations. They are included because published evidence attributes differ from Binance — not because Binance is “bad”, and not because of commercial relationships.

Binance dossier Visit Binance

Why these venues are included

Each candidate differs from Binance on at least one published evidence attribute (regulation, legal-entity mapping, PoR, custody, geographic records, products, or completeness). Inclusion is deterministic from the public snapshot.

Evidence attributes

Venue	Regulation	Legal entities	PoR	Custody	Geographic scope	Products	Coverage
Binance	4	4	1	3	3	4	6 / 7i
OKX	2	6	2	2	16	7	7 / 7i
Gate	1	1	1	7	35	3	6 / 7i
Bybit	0	1	1	0	15	6	5 / 7i
Kraken	1	1	1	1	16	5	7 / 7i

OKX

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelPoR availabilityFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction

— Regulatory records on file: Binance 4 (exact IDs 4) vs OKX 2 (exact IDs 1).
— Custody claim records: Binance 3 vs OKX 2.
— PoR snapshots on file: Binance 1 vs OKX 2 (PoR ≠ audit).
— Fee snapshots on file: Binance 0 vs OKX 2.

Explore dossier Compare with Binance Visit OKX

Gate

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction

— Regulatory records on file: Binance 4 (exact IDs 4) vs Gate 1 (exact IDs 1).
— Custody claim records: Binance 3 vs Gate 7.
— Geographic restriction records: Binance 3 vs Gate 35.
— Product records: Binance 4 vs Gate 3.

Explore dossier Visit Gate

Bybit

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction

— Regulatory records on file: Binance 4 (exact IDs 4) vs Bybit 0 (exact IDs 0).
— Custody claim records: Binance 3 vs Bybit 0.
— Fee snapshots on file: Binance 0 vs Bybit 2.
— Geographic restriction records: Binance 3 vs Bybit 15.

Explore dossier Compare with Binance Visit Bybit

Kraken

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction

— Regulatory records on file: Binance 4 (exact IDs 4) vs Kraken 1 (exact IDs 1).
— Custody claim records: Binance 3 vs Kraken 1.
— Fee snapshots on file: Binance 0 vs Kraken 2.
— Geographic restriction records: Binance 3 vs Kraken 16.

Explore dossier Visit Kraken

What remains unresolved

Open questions and missing domains stay unknown. An empty cell is not a safety finding.

Binance: Fee schedule blocked by bot/JS wall; no official PDF numeric schedule confirmed this phase
OKX: Status page located; no dated material incident structured this phase
Gate: Fee schedule not confirmed in primary fetch this session
Gate: No confirmed primary incident packaged
Bybit: SATOS partnership terms are regional/partner-scoped; not applied as global Bybit custody
Bybit: No confirmed primary incident record packaged this phase
Kraken: Status page located; no dated material incident structured this phase

Related comparisons

Limitations

This is not a “best alternative” ranking. Evidence differences can change as dossiers are re-verified. Regional records do not imply global approval.