Alternatives

Deribit identification mark (not an official logo)

Deribit Alternatives — Evidence Comparison

Alternative venues are shown for evidence comparison and are not recommendations. They are included because published evidence attributes differ from Deribit — not because Deribit is “bad”, and not because of commercial relationships.

Why these venues are included

Each candidate differs from Deribit on at least one published evidence attribute (regulation, legal-entity mapping, PoR, custody, geographic records, products, or completeness). Inclusion is deterministic from the public snapshot.

Evidence attributes

VenueRegulationLegal entitiesPoRCustodyGeographic scopeProductsCoverage
11112246 / 7i
26221677 / 7i
4413347 / 7i
00114345 / 7i
11111567 / 7i
23133827 / 7i
OKX identification mark

OKX

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelPoR availabilityFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction
  • — Regulatory records on file: Deribit 1 (exact IDs 1) vs OKX 2 (exact IDs 1).
  • — Custody claim records: Deribit 1 vs OKX 2.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Deribit 1 vs OKX 2 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Deribit 0 vs OKX 2.
Binance identification mark

Binance

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction
  • — Regulatory records on file: Deribit 1 (exact IDs 1) vs Binance 4 (exact IDs 4).
  • — Custody claim records: Deribit 1 vs Binance 3.
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Deribit 0 vs Binance 2.
  • — Geographic restriction records: Deribit 22 vs Binance 3.
HTX identification mark (not an official logo)

HTX

Regulatory evidenceFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction
  • — Regulatory records on file: Deribit 1 (exact IDs 1) vs HTX 0 (exact IDs 0).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Deribit 0 vs HTX 2.
  • — Geographic restriction records: Deribit 22 vs HTX 43.
  • — Product records: Deribit 4 vs HTX 4 (overlap 4).
Bybit identification mark (not an official logo)

Bybit

Regulatory evidenceFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityJurisdiction
  • — Regulatory records on file: Deribit 1 (exact IDs 1) vs Bybit 1 (exact IDs 0).
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Deribit 0 vs Bybit 2.
  • — Geographic restriction records: Deribit 22 vs Bybit 15.
  • — Product records: Deribit 4 vs Bybit 6 (overlap 4).
Crypto.com identification mark (not an official logo)

Crypto.com

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction
  • — Regulatory records on file: Deribit 1 (exact IDs 1) vs Crypto.com 2 (exact IDs 2).
  • — Custody claim records: Deribit 1 vs Crypto.com 3.
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Deribit 0 vs Crypto.com 2.
  • — Geographic restriction records: Deribit 22 vs Crypto.com 38.

What remains unresolved

Open questions and missing domains stay unknown. An empty cell is not a safety finding.

  • Deribit: Official Fees article exists but Cloudflare bot wall blocked primary fetch; rates not SAFE-applied from secondary index alone
  • Deribit: No confirmed primary incident packaged
  • OKX: Status page located; no dated material incident structured this phase
  • Binance: ADGM Nest trio roles mapped from official ADGM Terms; Binance FZE mapped from FZE Terms + VARA VL/24/04/001. Do not treat any single entity licence as brand-wide global authorisation. Nest Trading Limited role kept as unknown enum (broker-dealer/off-exchange per terms) pending richer role taxonomy.
  • HTX: Current HTX Platform User Agreement defines contracting parties as collective 'HTX Operators' (legal persons/DAO/unincorporated organisations/teams) without naming a single global operator company. Do not inherit Huobi Global Limited / Huobi Global S.A. as current HTX operator without a current primary source tying that name to today's platform.
  • HTX: No regulator-register row attachable: named current global HTX operator entity still unresolved. Legacy Huobi licence claims from secondary news not applied.
  • Bybit: SATOS partnership terms are regional/partner-scoped; not applied as global Bybit custody. Added PoR wallet-disclosure claim only.
  • Bybit: No confirmed primary incident record packaged this phase

Limitations

This is not a “best alternative” ranking. Evidence differences can change as records are re-verified. Regional records do not imply global approval.