VENUEVERITAS

Alternatives

Bybit Alternatives — Evidence Comparison

Alternative venues are shown for evidence comparison and are not recommendations. They are included because published evidence attributes differ from Bybit — not because Bybit is “bad”, and not because of commercial relationships.

Bybit dossierVisit Bybit

Why these venues are included

Each candidate differs from Bybit on at least one published evidence attribute (regulation, legal-entity mapping, PoR, custody, geographic records, products, or completeness). Inclusion is deterministic from the public snapshot.

Evidence attributes

VenueRegulationLegal entitiesPoRCustodyGeographic scopeProductsCoverage
Bybit01101565 / 7i
Bitget01112846 / 7i
OKX26221677 / 7i
Binance4413346 / 7i

Bitget

Custody modelRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completeness
  • — Custody claim records: Bybit 0 vs Bitget 1.
  • — Geographic restriction records: Bybit 15 vs Bitget 28.
  • — Product records: Bybit 6 vs Bitget 4.
  • — Public-record completeness composite differs (Bybit 22 vs Bitget 27).
Explore dossierCompare with BybitVisit Bitget

OKX

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelPoR availabilityRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction
  • — Regulatory records on file: Bybit 0 (exact IDs 0) vs OKX 2 (exact IDs 1).
  • — Custody claim records: Bybit 0 vs OKX 2.
  • — PoR snapshots on file: Bybit 1 vs OKX 2 (PoR ≠ audit).
  • — Geographic restriction records: Bybit 15 vs OKX 16.
Explore dossierVisit OKX

Binance

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction
  • — Regulatory records on file: Bybit 0 (exact IDs 0) vs Binance 4 (exact IDs 4).
  • — Custody claim records: Bybit 0 vs Binance 3.
  • — Fee snapshots on file: Bybit 2 vs Binance 0.
  • — Geographic restriction records: Bybit 15 vs Binance 3.
Explore dossierCompare with BybitVisit Binance

What remains unresolved

Open questions and missing domains stay unknown. An empty cell is not a safety finding.

  • Bybit: SATOS partnership terms are regional/partner-scoped; not applied as global Bybit custody
  • Bybit: No confirmed primary incident record packaged this phase
  • Bitget: VARA public register (56 licensed VASPs) checked; BTG Technology Holdings / Bitget not listed. No record ≠ Unregulated — no authorization row packed
  • Bitget: No confirmed primary incident record packaged
  • OKX: Status page located; no dated material incident structured this phase
  • Binance: Fee schedule blocked by bot/JS wall; no official PDF numeric schedule confirmed this phase

Related comparisons

Limitations

This is not a “best alternative” ranking. Evidence differences can change as dossiers are re-verified. Regional records do not imply global approval.