Alternatives

OKX Alternatives — Evidence Comparison

Alternative venues are shown for evidence comparison and are not recommendations. They are included because published evidence attributes differ from OKX — not because OKX is “bad”, and not because of commercial relationships.

OKX dossier Visit OKX

Why these venues are included

Each candidate differs from OKX on at least one published evidence attribute (regulation, legal-entity mapping, PoR, custody, geographic records, products, or completeness). Inclusion is deterministic from the public snapshot.

Evidence attributes

Venue	Regulation	Legal entities	PoR	Custody	Geographic scope	Products	Coverage
OKX	2	6	2	2	16	7	7 / 7i
Gate	1	1	1	7	35	3	6 / 7i
Bitget	0	1	1	1	28	4	6 / 7i
Binance	4	4	1	3	3	4	6 / 7i
Bybit	0	1	1	0	15	6	5 / 7i

Gate

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelPoR availabilityFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction

— Regulatory records on file: OKX 2 (exact IDs 1) vs Gate 1 (exact IDs 1).
— Custody claim records: OKX 2 vs Gate 7.
— PoR snapshots on file: OKX 2 vs Gate 1 (PoR ≠ audit).
— Fee snapshots on file: OKX 2 vs Gate 0.

Explore dossier Compare with OKX Visit Gate

Bitget

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelPoR availabilityRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction

— Regulatory records on file: OKX 2 (exact IDs 1) vs Bitget 0 (exact IDs 0).
— Custody claim records: OKX 2 vs Bitget 1.
— PoR snapshots on file: OKX 2 vs Bitget 1 (PoR ≠ audit).
— Geographic restriction records: OKX 16 vs Bitget 28.

Explore dossier Compare with OKX Visit Bitget

Binance

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelPoR availabilityFee transparencyRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction

— Regulatory records on file: OKX 2 (exact IDs 1) vs Binance 4 (exact IDs 4).
— Custody claim records: OKX 2 vs Binance 3.
— PoR snapshots on file: OKX 2 vs Binance 1 (PoR ≠ audit).
— Fee snapshots on file: OKX 2 vs Binance 0.

Explore dossier Compare with OKX Visit Binance

Bybit

Regulatory evidenceCustody modelPoR availabilityRegional availabilityProduct availabilityPublic-record completenessJurisdiction

— Regulatory records on file: OKX 2 (exact IDs 1) vs Bybit 0 (exact IDs 0).
— Custody claim records: OKX 2 vs Bybit 0.
— PoR snapshots on file: OKX 2 vs Bybit 1 (PoR ≠ audit).
— Geographic restriction records: OKX 16 vs Bybit 15.

Explore dossier Visit Bybit

What remains unresolved

Open questions and missing domains stay unknown. An empty cell is not a safety finding.

OKX: Status page located; no dated material incident structured this phase
Gate: Fee schedule not confirmed in primary fetch this session
Gate: No confirmed primary incident packaged
Bitget: VARA public register (56 licensed VASPs) checked; BTG Technology Holdings / Bitget not listed. No record ≠ Unregulated — no authorization row packed
Bitget: No confirmed primary incident record packaged
Binance: Fee schedule blocked by bot/JS wall; no official PDF numeric schedule confirmed this phase
Bybit: SATOS partnership terms are regional/partner-scoped; not applied as global Bybit custody
Bybit: No confirmed primary incident record packaged this phase

Related comparisons

Limitations

This is not a “best alternative” ranking. Evidence differences can change as dossiers are re-verified. Regional records do not imply global approval.